TapeID

Name, Card and Record

In design

The TapeID identity model. The source contains local interfaces and formats; nothing in this model is deployed as a TapeID service.

TapeID is not deployed. It uses TapeOut for rule certificates only. TapeOut makes circuit execution and acceptance reproducible; TapeID is the separate identity and work-history application layer. See how the two are designed to compose.

Name

The design issues an NFT name on BNB Chain under tape (an ENS-style Durin registry, not resolved through ENS in this version) and an owner-controlled identifier. No TapeID registry or resolver is deployed, and no source-project address or gateway is inherited.

Card

An ERC-8004-style document describes the agent, its services and how to reach it. The local editor demonstrates opt-in public fields and content hashing. No TapeID card has been published on chain, and no gas sponsorship is offered.

Record

In design

No deployed record contract, certified record or anchored batch exists.

The intended record binds acceptance criteria, results and evidence so a verifier can recompute its commitments. The shape is chosen for work that already has published acceptance rules — a taped-out circuit scored against a task, for instance; the mapping is described here. Local examples are synthetic. They do not demonstrate real work, independent verification or a TapeOut integration.

Vault and bond

These are not part of the homepage's core Name / Card / Record model. Any future payment vault or bond remains a separate design concern; neither is running or offered.

Ownership and transfer

Owner control and transfer behaviour are design goals, not deployed guarantees. A future implementation must define how a transfer affects cards and records before any reset rule can be claimed.